The release of 1984
official papers in London
shows that an Irish politician said , presumably to somebody who seemed to
matter, that I “was the brains behind the republican movement”.
I was flattered by anyone thinking I had either the brains
or the ability to be any such thing, but
the statement is nonsense.
If I had received an invitation to write speeches for Gerry Adams as this
politician asserted, I would have been flattered by that request also, and
would have responded with the same courtesy as Gerry Adams has always
shown me. But being aware of both the
literary and the political abilities of Gerry Adams I know
that my contribution would have been not only pedestrian and unhelpful
but unnecessary.
However, a serious aspect of this assertion is that it is
one of many made to governments in Dublin and London
through the years some of which were
nonsense. We know of some of them, there must have been many we don’t
know about. The result of such stuff must be that these governments are willingly
fed with misinformation which can only hinder those who are looking for
rational solutions to problems. The damage done if this means a war is
lengthened, must be considered when one is considering the contribution,
responsible or otherwise, of those who made the assertions. And their motive
for doing it. Another important aspect of the matter is that a simple phone
call could have shown how nonsensical and false the statement about the brains
was.
Interestingly, a statement of much the same kind was made
at, I believe, much the same time by another person, this time a journalist
whose sympathies would be rather different from those of the Irish
politician mentioned above. The fact
that Dublin and government officials and such people accepted statements of
such a character is one of the most frightening things about what they did
during the years when people were suffering in Ireland’s northeast. The
responsibility of Irish and British
officials both here and abroad for the
lengthening of the conflict in Ireland
has yet to be examined , probably because no-one is willing to take the risk of
showing what really happened. The idea that nothing good can come from a
certain class, or a certain person or party is very much alive in politics , so
the official line has to be that if a
good speech is produced it must be a ghost writer who wrote it and if votes are obtained in elections, it is all
due to impersonation. It used to be said
that until poets and other writers took an interest in modern republicanism it
would be second class. Then the poets and writers and artists
did , and suddenly it did not matter any more. It was an interesting
reminder that the tactic is as old as the hills – remember the question in the
Christian Gospel, can any good thing come from Nazareth?
No comments:
Post a Comment