Wednesday 27 March 2019

MODERN CRUSADES

Last week BBC TV broadcast a film "Guns and Rosaries" about the life and work of Father Patrick Peyton, an Irish priest who created "Rosary Rallies" that attracted  millions of people to  listen to his  religious message, " The Family That Prays Together Stays Together".

In 1954 Fr. Peyton  came to Belfast where tens of thousands of men, women and children gathered in an open air venue, a cinema and a football ground to hear him. Already he had attracted not only millions of hopeful listeners worldwide but also teams of films stars, technicians, industrialists, investors, newspaper owners to help him spread his religious message.  Film stars of that time, Bing Crosby, Edward G. Robinson, Frank Sinatra, Maureen O Hara , James Cagney and many others  not forgotten even yet, helped in his "Crusade for the Family Rosary".  In  Ireland church  committees were  appointed to arrange  great assemblies of people to hear the message "The Family That Prays Together Stays Together"  and to promise their families  would be like that. The Family Rosary - families on their knees praying together at home  - found many new homes for this simple, repetitive prayer that was now blossoming out from Patrick Peyton's Mayo fireside into families across the world.  

Some Irish bishops, like Dan Mageean in Belfast, welcomed Patrick Peyton and prepared happily for  monumental rallies, others, like John Charles Mc  Quade in Dublin  disapproved of them .

Bishop Mageean appointed committees to organise rallies in  Belfast,  Ballymena  and of course Downpatrick, traditionally said to be St Patrick's very special place; people  marched  with banners and flags, singing all the way to the hosting places.

The rallies were spectacularly successful. Tens of thousands of families made a pledge  to pray  once every day as a united Family who, praying together, would stay together, holding fast against the modern trend towards divorce and the dissolution of Family as  the  bedrock of civilised Christian living.

It was hard to imagine  all this attracting the helpful assistance  of governments and their financiers and perhaps  even being financed by the CIA, none of them being  noted  for special piety.  But it happened.

The BBC programme "Guns and Rosaries"  helps to fill  in the outline of what people in Belfast in later years began to suspect.  The Rosary Rallies were too vast and too popular not to be of great interest to government agencies, financiers and politicians who were fascinated by the efficiency with which Patrick Peyton attracted millions to his cause and dollars to match. He  believed  the simple traditional family prayer that helped Irish people to endure hunger and cruelty  would help  the modern world to endure, possibly even lessen, some of the abuses of the modern world, starting with America - if he could persuade millions of good people in  millions of good families to help him, and if he could get the celebrities whom  the people loved to help him too.

Powerful people who noticed his success, however, were fighting their own crusade at the time, "against godless communism".  Patrick Peyton's religious  mission was born at a time when  sentiment  was  replacing spirituality in both  popular and official religion, sentiment more comfortable in the cinema than in the hardship of many religious households, when Christian religious action and concern  were  being directed away from the present evils of present miserable systematic poverty, more and more towards the future defeat of the possibly future evils of possibly " godless communism",  when Bing Crosby and Barry Fitzgerald were still on cinema screens as Fathers O'Malley and Fitzgibbon showing how personal religious sweetness and light could overcome even the hardest of capitalistic hearts when personal holiness mattered and social change did not.  In Europe and the USA after WW2  great political and financial interests seemed reasonably under control  but even there and certainly in other parts of the world new and worrying religious and social thoughts were emerging, most of all  in Latin America where even important members of the Catholic church had rediscovered that religion was for  setting people free of repression, not for enclosing them in oppressive economic cages.  Liberation Theology in the decades after WW2 was becoming dangerous doctrine.

The CIA was one of many organisations intent on dealing with dangerous social doctrines. It offered finance to  the crusading work of Patrick Peyton. The family hearth after all was the very heart at which "godless communism" was striking; the Bay of Pigs was not the only kind of answer to this, or the assassination of one  archbishop, or the freezing out of another. Indeed these might prove no answers at all. So rumour was that the CIA had become a subscriber to the Fr. Peyton Rosary Crusade funds.

Rumours  of what was happening to, or with, the Peyton Crusade in other parts of the world  stirred up little interest in Belfast. During  the next decades we had other matters to think about, not yet realising how  globalisation meant we are all involved now  in everything, everywhere.  But we also had to think of what our religious belief and action - or religious doubt and inaction- really meant in our rapidly changing world and about what political and economic campaigns  religious people  were being pulled into. Anyway, the threat of Belfast being overwhelmed by "godless communism" was remote.  The communist newspaper in the shop where I got mine was bought by three people, one was the Secretary of the local  Party, another was me and I forget who the third one was. Betty Sinclair maybe or Andy Barr  who, as far as I knew were too busy trying to get people decent houses and jobs to be over- concerned about the CIA and its crusade.

 "Guns and Rosaries" strengthens the rumours, it does not prove a case against Patrick Peyton. But it prompts questions about  leadership, about how our religious ideas come into fashion or go out of it. The pre-Christian lawyer Cicero used to ask, as first step in solving cases, "Cui bono?, who gets the advantage from all this "? 

Good question.  Does it matter why John Paul  was elected Pope  and  created a campaign against "godless communism" in his native Poland? Or why an Archbishop of Buenos Aires became Pope, or Archbishop Fulton Sheen in the nineteen fifties created a mission for Latin America supported by  funds from his TV success in the USA at a  time  when  the USA had its own unsolved problems of poverty and injustice? Or if a Rosary Crusade became funded by, among other interested parties, The Central Intelligence Agency ?

Or that Archbishop  Romero was shot dead at Mass in  San Salvador?

Questions worth coming back to sometime.......after Brexit maybe ?....... Cui bono ?...........

No comments:

Post a Comment