Monday 20 February 2017

Who said this?


 

Who said the following -   President Trump,  a friend of President Trump or  an opponent of President Trump ?

Our government has been for the past few years under the control of the heads of great allied corporations with special interests. It has not controlled these interests and assigned them their  proper place in the whole system of business; it has submitted  itself to their control. As a result there have grown up vicious systems and schemes of governmental favouritism  far reaching in effect upon the whole fabric of life, touching every inhabitant of the land , laying unfair and impossible handicaps upon competitors, imposing taxes in every direction, stifling everywhere the free spirit of American enterprise.

This tyranny, this  control of the law, of legislation and adjudication by organisations which do not represent the people, by means which are private and selfish, specifically the conduct of our affairs and the shaping of our legislation in the interest of special bodies of capital and those who organise their use --  this  alliance  of political machines with selfish business to do is exploitation of the people by legal and political means.

We have seen many of our governments under these influences cease to be representative governments, cease to be governments representative of the people, and become governments representative of special interests controlled by machines which in their turn are not controlled by the people. The gentlemen whose ideas have been sought are the big manufacturers, bankers and heads of the great railroad companies. The masters of the government of the United States are the combined manufacturers and capitalists of the United States...........................

It was not a friend or opponent of President Trump but a President of the United States of America, Woodrow Wilson, who was saying such things  a few years before the financial collapse that climaxed in 1929 and brought the United States commercial civilisation to its knees and frightened the whole world of business and politics.

Now President Trump is promising America prosperity by reducing curbs on capital, bringing industrialists even closer  to the centre of government, making  companies that have fled to foreign countries come back home where eventually they may  bring their lower pay regimes with them, thus facing the possibility of American companies being overtaken by cheaper economies abroad  or producing cheaply at home goods the world is willing or able  to buy now from abroad  - while their  customers in the USA  will pay taxes for imported goods that may get in, meanwhile  strengthening the military in America and Europe so as to make America great again, with industrialists and bankers still as powerful as before but, in theory anyway, more under Presidential control.

US personal Presidential power is being built up through arguments  with those already powerful  in America (while there is still time for it), with  the press, the spying services, vulnerable industrialists, and by contradicting policies which have helped political parties to flourish until they think they cannot do without them, enmity towards Russia for example. Opposition to  Russia  has been  fostered in Europe and America  since WW2  and  governmental policies, military, economic, and European union policies, have been  built on it. Maybe President Trump hopes to  create stability - not peace, but stability - by agreement and manoevering within the United States rather than by military threat abroad.

But the Presidential determination  to build up the military --  does it mean that if he doesn't  need  the military  for foreign wars, it may be  needed  for service on,  as it were,  the Home Front?

Surely not for that kind of Homeland security !

The ideas of  Woodrow Wilson at the start of this blog were quoted  in 1920 to a New York State law court by the Irish trades union organiser James Larkin - who died 70 years ago this year - possibly  Larkin knew more about the realities of American government than the court  knew - or wanted to know.

No comments:

Post a Comment